A new model name does not always mean a new foundation. A system may change which tokens can interact, share key and value heads, route tokens through different MLPs, accept another modality, or replace attention altogether. To understand the change, identify the contract that changed and the parts that remained fixed.
This chapter closes the subject with a method for reading architecture and scaling claims. It uses small calculations rather than a catalogue of model names. You will compare:
- dense and sparse visibility graphs;
- advertised context length and demonstrated long-range use;
- multi-head, grouped-query, and multi-query K/V caches;
- total and active parameters in a mixture-of-experts layer;
- image tokenization and image-text fusion;
- attention-based and state-space sequence mixing;
- measured scaling trends and unsupported extrapolation;
- model size, training tokens, and a fixed compute budget.
The final lesson separates a base model from post-training, retrieval, tools, evaluation, product policy, and infrastructure. These layers work together in an LLM product, but they are not one mechanism and do not belong in one architecture claim.
The calculations are reproduced by the chapter script. Its scaling values are deliberately illustrative. Research results retain the models, data, hardware, tasks, and measured ranges reported by their sources.