Bayes' Rule
Bayes' rule connects two conditional probabilities.
Meaning
Bayes' rule updates belief after evidence.
P(A)is the priorP(B | A)is the likelihood of evidence underAP(B)normalizes the resultP(A | B)is the posterior
Read it as:
posterior is proportional to likelihood times prior.
The denominator P(B) makes the posterior a valid probability.
This normalization is not bookkeeping noise. If there are several possible causes for the evidence, their unnormalized scores must be compared against the total evidence probability so the posterior probabilities fit together.
Small Example
Suppose:
P(A) = 0.2
P(B | A) = 0.6
P(B) = 0.3
Then:
Before seeing B, the probability of A was 0.2. After seeing evidence B,
the probability becomes 0.4. The evidence increased belief in A.
Why the Denominator Matters
The numerator P(B | A)P(A) gives the joint probability P(A and B).
To get P(A | B), we divide by the total probability of the evidence B.
This is the same denominator idea from conditional probability.
ML Reading
Bayesian thinking appears in uncertainty, priors, posterior inference, model comparison, and probabilistic prediction.
Even when a model is not explicitly Bayesian, Bayes' rule is part of the probability language around learning from evidence.
Suppose P(A) = 0.25, P(B | A) = 0.8, and P(B) = 0.5.
What is P(A | B)?
Compute it first, then check your number.
Hint
Compute (0.8 * 0.25) / 0.5.
Solution
P(A | B) = (0.8 * 0.25) / 0.5 = 0.2 / 0.5 = 0.4. The numerator is the joint
score for A with evidence B; dividing by P(B) normalizes it into the
posterior.
In Bayes' rule, which term is the prior: P(A), P(B | A), or P(A | B)?
Answer it first, then check.
Hint
The prior is the probability before seeing evidence B.
Solution
The prior is P(A). It is the probability assigned to A before conditioning
on the evidence B.
If P(A) = 0.2 and P(A | B) = 0.4, did evidence B increase or decrease
belief in A?
Answer it first, then check.
Hint
Compare posterior with prior.
Solution
It increased belief in A, because the probability changed from 0.2 to
0.4. The posterior is larger than the prior, so evidence B supports A in
this example.
Suppose P(A) = 0.1, P(B | A) = 0.9, and P(B) = 0.3.
What is P(A | B)?
Compute it first, then check your number.
Hint
Compute (0.9 * 0.1) / 0.3.
Solution
P(A | B) = (0.9 * 0.1) / 0.3 = 0.09 / 0.3 = 0.3. The denominator restricts
attention to cases where evidence B happened, turning the joint score into a
conditional probability.
Enter 1 if the denominator in Bayes' rule normalizes the posterior so it is a
valid probability after evidence.
Compute it first, then check your number.
Hint
The numerator gives P(A and B), not yet P(A | B).
Solution
Enter 1. The numerator gives the joint probability of A and evidence B.
Dividing by P(B) restricts attention to cases where the evidence happened and
produces the posterior probability.
Before Moving On
Bayes' rule is a disciplined way to update probability after evidence.